A HISTORY OF CESAREAN SECTION
The origin of the name "cesarean section"
is unknown. Three principal explanations have been suggested.
1) Legend says that Julius Caesar was born in
this manner, hence the name "Caesarean". There are several reasons to doubt this. First, the mother of Julius Caesar lived for
many years after his birth and in 100 B.C. the survival rate for the procedure
was
essentially zero. Second, the
operation, whether performed on the living or the dead, is not mentioned by any
medical writer before the Middle Ages.
Birth of Julius Caesar, 1506 French woodblock (Wellcome Library) |
2) It may have been derived from
a Roman law, supposedly created by Numa Pompilius (eighth century B.C.),
ordering that the procedure be performed upon women dying in the last few weeks
of pregnancy in the hope of saving the child.
This explanation then holds that the lex regia, as it was called at
first, became the lex caesarea under the emperors, and the operation itself
became known as the caesarean operation. The German term Kaiserschnitt reflects
this derivation. 3) The word caesarean was possibly derived
sometime in the Middle Ages from the Latin verb caedere, "to
cut." This explanation of the term
caesarean seems most logical, but exactly when it was applied to the operation
is uncertain. Since "section" is derived from the Latin word seco,
which means "cut", the term Cesarean section seems redundant
In reference to abdominal delivery in
antiquity, it is pertinent that no such operation is mentioned by Hippocrates,
Galen, Celsus, Paulus, Soranus, or any other classical medical writer. If
cesarean
section were employed at that time, it is surprising that Soranus,
whose extensive work of the second century A.D. covers all aspects of
obstetrics, does not mention cesarean
Soranus of Ephesus (Nat Library of Medicine) |
Several references to abdominal delivery
appear in the Talmud (Jewish civil and religious law writings) between the
second and sixth centuries A.D., but whether they were used in a clinical
setting is doubtful. Cesarean section on the dead appears to have been
practiced, however, soon after the Catholic Church gained dominance, to enable
baptism of the child. Locally, two records of postmortem sections are known,
one at Mission Dolores in San
Francisco in, 1805, and another at the Santa
Clara Mission, in 1825. Neither infant survived.
C Section on expired woman (Wikipedia) |
The earliest cesarean section done on a living
woman was reported in 1500, performed by Jacob Nufer, a castrator of pigs at
Sigerehausen, Switzerland. The patient (his wife) and the baby both survived,
but since the mother subsequently delivered five more children vaginally there
is doubt about the report's validity. Dr. Robert Harris reported on the first
known cesarean operation in the U.S. A fourteen-year-old quadroon performed it
on herself in a snowbank in Nassau, New York, using an L-shaped incision,
dressed by her employer. Mother and baby survived.
Credit for the first Cesarean section
performed by an American physician goes to Dr. John Lambert Richmond. Growing
up impoverished, he educated himself during childhood, eventually gaining entrance
to the newly organized Medical College of Ohio. Under its founder, the
formidable Daniel Drake (see blog of 9/16/2019), he received his M.D. degree in
1822. He also studied to become an ordained Baptist minister. Called to a house
on the
evening of April 22, 1827, Dr. Richmond found a primigravida exhausted
from a thirty-hour labor, with no cervical dilation, and with seizures
(probable eclampsia). He was seven miles from home, in a storm. In Richmond's
own words, "…with only a case of common pocket instruments, about one
o'clock at night I commenced the cesarean section. Here I must….relate the
condition of the house, which was made of logs that were green and put together
not more than a week before. The crevices were not chinked, there was no
chimney, nor chamber floor. The night was stormy and windy, insomuch that the
assistants had to hold blankets to keep the candles from being blown out."
Under the precarious candlelight, Richmond made a vertical incision, removed
the placenta, and delivered a large infant that did not survive. He found no
opening between uterus and vagina. The uterus was not sutured closed (custom at
the time), and the abdominal wall closed in two stages. The only complication
to the mother was an infected hematoma, drained. She returned to work 24 days
after the operation.
Article by Richmond (Hathi Trust) |
Maternal mortality rates from cesarean
section in the 19th century were 85 percent or higher, with the operation done
as a last resort to save the life of the mother. Dr. Harris noted that as late
as 1879, cesarean section was more successful when performed by the patient
herself (or ripped open by a bull's horn). He compared nine such cases from the
literature, with five recoveries, to twelve cesarean sections done in New York
City during the same period with only one recovery.
The turning point came in 1882 when Max
Saenger, a 28-year-old assistant to Dr. Credé at the University Clinic in
Leipzig,
introduced suturing of the uterine wall, using silver wires. Eight out
of seventeen mothers survived their sections, remarkable for the time. New
surgical techniques, antibiotics, and blood transfusions have lowered the risk
dramatically since then. In 1950, D'Espo reported 1000 consecutive cesarean
deliveries without a single maternal death. The frequency of the operation
rose, from 5 percent of births in 1970 to 23 percent in 1985. The CDC reports a
rate of 31.9 percent of births for 2018.
Max Saenger (Wikipedia) |
The present state of cesarean section
surgery enables millions of women to avoid otherwise difficult childbirths with
a safe and healthy outcome.
Michael Shea MD
SOURCES:
Creasy, R K. and Resnik, R. Maternal
Fetal Medicine Principles and Practice. 1984; W.B. Saunders Company.
Cunningham, F. G, MacDonald,
Paul C. and Gant, Williams, J W. Williams Obstetrics. 1989; Appleton and
Lange.
Eastman, N J and Helman, L
M. Obstetrics. 1961;
Appleton-Century-Crofts Inc.
Harris, Henry. California's
Medical Story. 1932; Carles C. Thomas.
Speert, Harold. Obstetrics
and Gynecology in America: A History. 1980; Waverly Press.
King, A G. "America's
First Cesarean Section". Obstetrics and Gynecology 1971; 37(5):
797-802.
Harris, R P. "A Study
and Analysis of One Hundred Cesarean Operations Performed in the United States
During the Present Century and Prior to the Year 1878". Am J Med Sci
1879; 77: 43-65.